Sex difference in Double Iron ultra-triathlon performance
© Sigg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 August 2012
Accepted: 14 January 2013
Published: 1 April 2013
The present study examined the sex difference in swimming (7.8 km), cycling (360 km), running (84 km), and overall race times for Double Iron ultra-triathletes.
Sex differences in split times and overall race times of 1,591 men and 155 women finishing a Double Iron ultra-triathlon between 1985 and 2012 were analyzed.
The annual number of finishes increased linearly for women and exponentially for men. Men achieved race times of 1,716 ± 243 min compared to 1,834 ± 261 min for women and were 118 ± 18 min (6.9%) faster (p < 0.01). Men finished swimming within 156 ± 63 min compared to women with 163 ± 31 min and were 8 ± 32 min (5.1 ± 5.0%) faster (p < 0.01). For cycling, men (852 ± 196 min) were 71 ± 70 min (8.3 ± 3.5%) faster than women (923 ± 126 min) (p < 0.01). Men completed the run split within 710 ± 145 min compared to 739 ± 150 min for women and were 30 ± 5 min (4.2 ± 3.4%) faster (p = 0.03). The annual three fastest men improved race time from 1,650 ± 114 min in 1985 to 1,339 ± 33 min in 2012 (p < 0.01). Overall race time for women remained unchanged at 1,593 ± 173 min with an unchanged sex difference of 27.1 ± 8.6%. In swimming, the split times for the annual three fastest women (148 ± 14 min) and men (127 ± 20 min) remained unchanged with an unchanged sex difference of 26.8 ± 13.5%. In cycling, the annual three fastest men improved the split time from 826 ± 60 min to 666 ± 18 min (p = 0.02). For women, the split time in cycling remained unchanged at 844 ± 54 min with an unchanged sex difference of 25.2 ± 7.3%. In running, the annual fastest three men improved split times from 649 ± 77 min to 532 ± 16 min (p < 0.01). For women, however, the split times remained unchanged at 657 ± 70 min with a stable sex difference of 32.4 ± 12.5%.
To summarize, the present findings showed that men were faster than women in Double Iron ultra-triathlon, men improved overall race times, cycling and running split times, and the sex difference remained unchanged across years for overall race time and split times. The sex differences for overall race times and split times were higher than reported for Ironman triathlon.
KeywordsTriathlon Ultra-endurance Swimming Cycling Running
Triathlon is a multi-sports competition covering the three endurance disciplines swimming, cycling, and running in this subsequent order. The most popular long-distance triathlon is the Ironman distance triathlon covering 3.8 km of swimming, 180 km of cycling, and 42 of km running [1–3]. The first Ironman triathlon was held in 1978 in Honolulu, Hawaii, and involved 12 male finishers . Apart from the Ironman distance triathlon, longer triathlon distances do exist from the Double Iron ultra-triathlon covering 7.6 of km swimming, 360 of km cycling, and 84.4 of km running , up to the Double Deca Iron ultra-triathlon covering 78 km of swimming, 3,600 km of cycling, and 844 km of running [5, 6]. The first Double Iron ultra-triathlon was held in 1985 in Huntsville (USA), where 23 men finished . Four years later, the first European Double Iron ultra-triathlon was held in Colmar (France) . Since the first event in 1985, participation progressively increased with an improvement of race times .
The sex difference in endurance performance has been investigated for different disciplines and distances. Several studies investigating sex differences focused on running [8–13]. In marathon running, the best men achieved ~11% faster running times than the best women . For other distances, a comparison of the world best running times from 100 m to 200 km showed that longer distances were associated with greater sex differences, with men being ~12.4% faster than women . Similar findings were reported for shorter distances where men were, on average, ~11% faster than women in a 1,500-m run . In long-distance swimming, women seemed to be able to achieve similar performances like men [14, 15]. However, when peak swim performance for the annual fastest ultra-distance swimmers was analyzed, a sex difference of ~11%–12% resulted over time [16, 17].
In cycling, the results of the World Track Cycling Championships from 1979 to 1999 in 200- and 1,000-m individual and team pursuit races for elite and junior athletes were investigated. The sex difference was ~11 ± 1.8% in all disciplines at all ages . Regarding triathlon, the sex differences in race times differ between the disciplines in ‘Ironman Hawaii’. Lepers  reported that the sex differences in Ironman Hawaii from 1988 to 2007 were smaller for swimming (~9.8%) than for cycling (~12.7%) and running (~13.3%), with a sex difference of ~12.6% for overall race time. This finding was confirmed by analyzing the top ten men and women triathletes of the best age groups in Ironman Hawaii from 2006 to 2008 . Lepers and Maffiuletti  reported a smaller sex difference in swimming (~12.1%) than in running (~18.2%) or cycling (~15.4%).
Regarding the change in sex difference over time, previous studies suggested a decrease in sex differences and a stabilization afterwards . In marathon running, the sex difference in performance between women and men has stabilized since 1988 at ~12%. In the early 1980s, the sex difference was narrowing from ~11.4% in 1980 to ~9.7% in 1983 . In Ironman Hawaii, performances in swimming, cycling, running, and overall race times showed no changes during the last two decades, neither for men nor for women . In swimming, cycling, and overall race times, the changes were between ~1.1% and ~0.02% per decade . The running performance changed by ~1.4% per decade. Since 1988, women improved their running performance by ~3.8% per decade . When the changes in sex difference in Ironman Hawaii were investigated between years 1983 and 2012, the sex difference in overall race time decreased from ~15.2% to ~11.3% . For the split disciplines, the sex difference remained unchanged for swimming (~12.5%) and cycling (~12.5%) but decreased for running from ~13.5% to ~7.3% . For longer triathlon distances such as the Triple Iron ultra-triathlon covering 11.4 km of swimming, 540 km of cycling, and 126.6 km of running, the sex difference in overall performance increased from ~10% in 1992 to ~42% in 2011 for the annual fastest finishers . For the annual fastest swimmers, the sex difference remained unchanged. In cycling and running, however, the sex differences increased from ~12% to ~40% and from ~10% to ~64%, respectively.
To date, no study investigated the changes in sex difference across years for the Double Iron ultra-triathlon distance. The present study intended to fill a gap in literature by investigating the changes in sex difference in Double Iron ultra-triathlon race times from the very first event in 1985 until 2012. Based upon present literature for Ironman Hawaii and Triple Iron ultra-triathlon, we hypothesized an unchanged sex difference in the swim performance but a decrease in the sex difference in performance in Double Iron ultra-triathlons across years.
The data set from this study was obtained from the race website of the International Ultra-Triathlon Association (IUTA)  and from the Race Directors. The split times in swimming, cycling, running, and overall race times of all finishers in Double Iron ultra-triathlons held all over the world between 1985 and 2012 were analyzed. This study was approved by the institutional review board of St. Gallen, Switzerland, with a waiver for the requirement of an informed consent, given that the study involved the analysis of publicly available data.
In total, data were available from 2,207 athletes, including 202 women (9.2%) and 2,005 men (90.8%). These 2,207 athletes participated in 29 races held in 17 different countries, leading to a number of 104 investigated events. Among the 2,207 athletes, 408 men (18.5%) and 47 women (2.1%) did not finish the race. Additionally, in 2007 and 2011, one male athlete was disqualified from each. Finally, data from 1,752 finishers (79.4% of all starters) including 1,597 men (91.2%) and 155 women (8.8%) could be analyzed. For the analysis of the development of race time in sex and sex difference, the split times per discipline (i.e., swimming, cycling, and running) and overall race time from the annual fastest and annual three fastest women and men were analyzed. In case the number of female and male finishers was below the required amount in a year, the respective year was excluded from data analysis.
In order to increase the reliability of data analyses, each set of data was tested for normal distribution as well as for homogeneity of variances prior to statistical analyses. Normal distribution was tested using a D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test, and homogeneity of variances was tested using Levene’s test. To find significant changes in the development of a variable across years, regression analyses were used. To find significant differences between two groups, Student’s t test was used in case of normal distributed data (with Welch’s correction in case of heteroscedasticity), and a Mann–Whitney test was used in case of not normal distributed data. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 19, IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism (Version 5, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data in the text are given as mean and standard deviation. Sex difference was calculated using the formula: (race time [women] − race time [men]) / race time [men] × 100. The sex difference was calculated for every pairing of equally placed athletes (e.g., between a woman and man at first place, between a woman and man at second place, etc.) before calculating mean value and standard deviation of all the pairings. In order to facilitate reading, all sex differences were transformed to absolute values before analysis. For all statistical tests, significance was accepted at p < 0.05 (two-sided for t tests).
Sex difference in overall race times
The three fastest women ever achieved 1,397 ± 61.7 min and were 199.0 ± 50.5 min (16.6 ± 4.5%) slower than the three fastest men ever with 1,198 ± 11.1 min (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A). In swimming, the three fastest women ever (132.7 ± 49.2 min) were not slower compared to the three fastest men (122.7 ± 6.1 min) (p > 0.05) (Figure 3B). In cycling, the three fastest men ever finished after 636.0 ± 11.4 min compared to the three fastest women ever with 756.3 ± 33.4 min and were 120 ± 11 min (18.9 ± 9.6%) faster (p < 0.01) (Figure 3C). In running, the three fastest men ever finished within 438.7 ± 7.8 min and were 70.0 ± 2.2 min (15.9 ± 2.9%) faster (p < 0.01) than the three fastest women ever with 508.7 ± 10.0 min (Figure 3D).
The ten fastest women ever achieved 1,444 ± 43.9 min and were 227 ± 0 min (18.6 ± 2.0%) slower than the ten fastest men ever with 1,217 ± 14.5 min (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A). In swimming, the ten fastest women ever (143.9 ± 25.0 min) were 17.3 ± 17.6 min (13.7 ± 2.3%) slower compared to the ten fastest men ever (126.6 ± 7.4 min) (p < 0.01) (Figure 3B). In cycling, the ten fastest men ever finished within 643.0 ± 17.2 min compared to the ten fastest women ever with 747.7 ± 20.1 min and were 104.7 ± 2.9 min (16.3 ± 16.8%) faster (p < 0.01) (Figure 3C). The ten fastest men ever completed the run within 445.7 ± 19.0 min and were 106.6 ± 15.2 min (23.9 ± 8.0%) faster (p < 0.01) compared to the ten fastest women ever with 552.3 ± 34.2 min (Figure 3D).
Sex difference in the annual fastest race times
Regarding the annual three fastest athletes, men achieved 1,335 ± 90.2 min for overall race times compared to women with 1,656 ± 109 min and were 321 ± 19 min (27.0 ± 10.7%) faster (p < 0.01) (Figure 4A). In swimming, the annual three fastest men achieved 127 ± 20 min and were 21.7 ± 6.6 min (26.7 ± 21.0%) faster than the annual three fastest women with 149 ± 13 min (p < 0.01) (Figure 4B). In the cycling split, the annual three fastest men (687 ± 34 min) were 157 ± 17 min (25.1 ± 11.8%) faster than the annual three fastest women (844 ± 54 min) (p < 0.01) (Figure 4C). In running, the annual three fastest men achieved 519 ± 53 min compared to the annual three fastest women with 657 ± 69 min and were 138 ± 16 min (32.4 ± 19.9%) faster (p < 0.01) (Figure 4D).
Changes in sex difference over time
The aim of this study was to investigate the sex difference in the Double Iron ultra-triathlon races held between 1985 and 2012. The main findings were the following: (1) men were faster than women for overall race times and split times, (2) men improved in the overall race times and split times in cycling and running, (3) the sex difference remained unchanged over time for both overall race time and split times, and (4) the sex differences for overall race times and split times were higher than reported for Ironman triathlon.
The number of male finishes increased exponentially over time, whereas the number of female finishes increased only linearly. Overall, women accounted for 8.4% of the field. The number of female finishes in Double Iron ultra-triathlons increased from 2% in the late 1980s up to 10% since 2001. In other ultra-distances such as running, an increase in women’s participation has been reported since 1977 [10, 11]. In the ‘Western States 100-Mile Endurance Run’ in the USA, the percentage of female athletes increased from 10% to 20% in the late 1980s to 20% to 22% since 2001 . The reason for this increase might be the higher number of participants aged 40 years and older , the higher number of women participating , and the increasing number of finished races per participant . These changes in female participation might be explained by changes in society. In the last years, the daily life of a woman came closer to men’s life concerning work, family and hobbies, claims, desires, and possibilities. Krouse et al.  investigated the motivation of female ultra-marathoners competing in running events exceeding the 26.2-mile distance. The majority of these women were full-time workers, married, childless, task oriented, and therefore not having the characteristics of women some decades ago .
The number of male finishes was, however, considerably higher and increased exponentially. Physically active men seemed to have a different motivation to compete in races compared to women. Krouse et al.  described female ultra-runners as task oriented, internally motivated, and health and financially conscious individuals. Men, however, seemed to prefer sports requiring skills needed for success in male–male physical competition . Additionally, men seemed to have a greater training motivation compared to women [23, 24]. These characteristics might explain both the exponential increase in male finishes and the low female participation.
Sex difference in performances
Men were faster than women, and men improved in overall race times, cycling, and running split times. The cycling and running split times were most probably responsible for the sex difference. The sex differences in Double Iron ultra-triathlon in overall race time and split times were greater than reported for shorter triathlon distances such as the Ironman triathlon. Lepers  reported sex differences of 9.8% in swimming, 12.7% in cycling, 13.3% in running, and 12.6% in overall race time in the Ironman Hawaii when investigating the time period 1981–2007. For the time period 2006–2008, Lepers and Maffiuletti  reported a lower sex difference in swimming (12.1%) than in cycling (15.4%) and running (18.2%).
These findings for the Ironman distance partly match with our findings for the Double Iron ultra-triathlon distance. The smaller sex difference in swim split times might be due to higher economy and mechanical efficiency of swimming in women compared to men . The small sex difference in swim split times matches also with recent findings for sex difference in ultra-swim performances in the 26.4-km open-water ultra-swim ‘Marathon Swim in Lake Zurich’. Eichenberger et al. reported a sex difference of 11.5% in open-water ultra-swimming performance in the last 25 years . In the English Channel Swim, no difference in the annual performance between women and men from 1900 to 2010 was found . A possible explanation for these findings could be a reduced surface area in the water giving some specific advantage for female triathletes in swimming performance . In ultra-triathlons, swimming has less influence on the overall race time than running or cycling [26, 27]. In a Triple Iron ultra-triathlon, the swim split seemed to have the lowest influence on overall race time . Swimming requires 8.6% of the overall race time in a Triple Iron ultra-triathlon, but cycling and running require 48.5% and 43.6%, respectively [26, 27]. The run split seemed to be the most important split discipline for a fast race time in an ultra-triathlon such as a Triple Iron ultra-triathlon [26, 27].
Changes in sex difference over time
Across years, the annual fastest men improved overall race times and split times in running. The annual three fastest men improved overall race times and both split times in cycling and running. Women, however, showed no changes in performance. The sex difference in overall race times and split times remained unchanged over time. Previous studies confirmed this finding and reported a stabilization in sex difference in endurance performance in the early 1980s . The sex differences of overall race time and split times were between 15% and 30% when regarding the fastest athletes ever and the changes in sex difference over time. These values were considerably higher compared to recent reports for Ironman triathletes . A recent study investigating the change in sex difference in performance in Ironman Hawaii showed a decrease in sex difference for overall race time (from 15.2% to 11.3%), an unchanged sex difference in swimming (12.5 ± 3.7%) and cycling (12.5 ± 2.7%), and a decrease in the sex difference in running from 13.5% to 7.3% .
A sex gap in endurance performance of 11%–12% seems to be of biological origin. Endurance performance is influenced by aerobic capacity and muscular strength . The higher sex differences in these ultra-endurance athletes might be explained by differences in anthropometric characteristics between female and male ultra-endurance athletes. Anthropometric characteristics such as the body mass index or the distribution of fat and muscle mass in men and women influence ultra-running performance . Body mass index was negatively correlated to average running speed in ultra-marathoners . Men have a higher body mass index than women, which matches with a higher muscle mass in male athletes . A higher body mass index may serve the ultra-marathoners with energy and is a combination of greater fat and muscle mass . A male Ironman triathlete with 41 kg of muscle mass has 31.7% more muscle than a female Ironman triathlete with 28 kg . Percentage of body fat is lower in male triathletes with 13.7% than in female athletes with 23.6% . The greater muscle mass in male ultra-endurance triathletes might be advantageous and might be the reason for faster performance and the sex difference in performance. Female ultra-marathoners, however, might have a greater fatigue resistance than men .
Increase in sex difference with increasing length of endurance performance
The sex differences in both overall race times and split times were considerably higher as reported for Ironman triathletes [1–3]. These differences might be explained by differences in anthropometric characteristics and training between Ironman triathletes and ultra-triathletes . A recent study compared Ironman triathletes and Triple Iron ultra-triathletes, and differences in both anthropometry and training between these two groups of athletes were found . Considering anthropometric characteristics, the Triple Iron ultra-triathletes were smaller, had shorter limbs, a higher body mass index, and larger limb circumferences compared to the Ironman triathletes. Regarding training, the Triple Iron ultra-triathletes invested more hours per week and covered more kilometers. Regarding predictor variables for overall race time, percentage of body fat, weekly training volume, and weekly kilometers in both cycling and running were related to Triple Iron ultra-triathlon race time. For Ironman triathletes, percentage of body fat, circumference of the upper arm, and speed in cycling training were associated with total race time.
A large sex difference in ultra-endurance performance has also been reported for multistage ultra-marathoners competing in the Marathon des Sables . Mean sex difference between 2003 and 2012 was ~31.7% with a decrease from ~39.5% in 2003 to ~24.1% in 2012. In Triple Iron ultra-triathletes, the sex difference in overall performance increased from ~10% in 1992 to ~42% in 2011 for the annual fastest finishers. In cycling and running, the sex differences increased from ~12% to ~40% and from ~10% to ~64%, respectively . Apart from physiological and anthropometric characteristics, the motivation in men with the greater training motivation compared to women [23, 24] and the intention to win in male–male physical competition  might explain why men compete faster than women in ultra-endurance performances. Additionally, the generally higher participation of men in competitions explains the faster performance in men .
In the race where the world record in Double Iron ultra-triathlon for women was achieved in 1994 in Huntsville, USA, the swim split was held downriver. The swim time of 76 min was never corrected for the current in the river, but is still held in the record statistics of the IUTA . Factors such as anthropometry [28, 31, 34], physiology , previous experience [34, 36], training [29, 31, 34, 37], pacing strategy , motivation , nutrition [38, 39], nationality [40, 41], and equipment  may influence overall race time, but were not considered. The influence of environmental factors on the performance of the triathletes was not considered [43–47].
Men were faster than women in Double Iron ultra-triathlon, men improved in overall race times, cycling and running split times, and the sex difference remained unchanged across years for overall race time and split times. The sex differences for overall race times and split times were higher than reported for Ironman triathlon but lower than reported for Triple Iron ultra-triathlon. Future studies need to investigate the sex difference in performance for longer triathlon distances such as the Quintuple Iron ultra-triathlon and the Deca Iron ultra-triathlon.
The authors received no funding.
- Lepers R: Analysis of Hawaii Ironman performances in elite triathletes from 1981 to 2007. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 1828-1834. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817e91a4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lepers R, Maffiuletti NA: Age and gender interactions in ultraendurance performance: insight from the triathlon. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011, 43: 134-139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Rosemann T, Lepers R: Sex difference in race performance and age of peak performance in the Ironman Triathlon World Championship from 1983 to 2012. Extreme Physiology & Medicine. 2012, 1: 15-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Lepers R: Participation and performance trends in ultra-triathlons from 1985 to 2009. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011, 21: e82-e90. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01160.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lenherr R, Knechtle B, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R: From Double Iron to Double Deca Iron ultra-triathlon - a retrospective data analysis from 1985 to 2011. Physical Culture and Sport Studies and Research. 2012, 54: 55-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lepers R, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T: Analysis of ultra-triathlon performances. Open Access J Sports Med. 2011, 2: 131-136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Lepers R, Rosemann T: European athletes dominate Double Iron ultra-triathlons – a retrospective data analysis from 1985 to 2010. Eur J Sport Sci. 2011, 10.1080/17461391.2011.641033.Google Scholar
- Cheuvront SN, Carter R, Deruisseau KC, Moffatt RJ: Running performance differences between men and women: an update. Sports Med. 2005, 35: 1017-1024. 10.2165/00007256-200535120-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coast JR, Blevins JS, Wilson BA: Do gender differences in running performance disappear with distance?. Can J Appl Physiol. 2004, 29: 139-145. 10.1139/h04-010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman MD, Ong JC, Wang G: Historical analysis of participation in 161 km ultramarathon in North America. Int J Hist Sport. 2010, 27: 1877-1891. 10.1080/09523367.2010.494385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman MD, Wegelin JA: The Western States 100-Mile Endurance Run: participation and performance trends. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41: 2191-2198. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a8d553.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lepers R, Cattagni T: Do older athletes reach limits in their performance during marathon running?. Age (Dordr). 2012, 34: 778-781.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sparling PB, O’Donnel EM, Snow TK: The gender difference in distance running performance has plateaued: an analysis of world rankings from 1980 to 1996. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30: 1725-1729. 10.1097/00005768-199812000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eichenberger E, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R: Best performance by men and women open-water swimmers during the ‘English Channel Swim’ from 1900 to 2010. J Sports Sci. 2012, 30: 1295-1301. 10.1080/02640414.2012.709264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eichenberger E, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R: No gender difference in peak performance in ultra-endurance swimming performance - analysis of the ‘Zurich 12-h Swim’ from 1996 to 2010. Chin J Physiol. 2012, 55: 346-351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eichenberger E, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R, Senn O: Sex difference in open-water ultra-swim performance in the longest freshwater lake swim in Europe. J Strength Cond Res. 2012, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318265a3e9.Google Scholar
- Fischer G, Knechtle B, Rüst CA, Rosemann T: Male swimmers cross the ‘English Channel’ faster than females. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013, 23 (1): e48-e55. 10.1111/sms.12008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schumacher YO, Mueller P, Keul J: Development of peak performance in track cycling. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001, 41: 139-146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T, Lepers R: Participation and performance in Triple Iron ultra-triathlon – a cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis. Asian J Sports Med. 2012, 3: 145-152.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- International Ultra-Triathlon Association:http://www.iutasport.com/,
- Krouse RZ, Ransdell BL, Lucas MS, Pritchard EM: Motivation, goal orientation, coaching, and training habits of women ultrarunners. J Strength Cond Res. 2011, 25: 2835-2842. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318204caa0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lombardo MP: On the evolution of sport. Evol Psychol. 2012, 10: 1-28. 10.1556/JEP.10.2012.1.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deaner RO: Distance running as an ideal domain for showing a sex difference in competitiveness. Arch Sex Behav. 2012, 10.1007/s10508-012-9965-z.Google Scholar
- Deaner RO, Mitchell D: More men run relatively fast in U.S. road races, 1981–2006: a stable sex difference in non-elite runners. Evol Psychol. 2011, 9: 600-621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toussaint HM, De Groot G, Savelberg HM, Vervoon K, Hollander AP, Van Ingen Schenau GJ: Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. J Biomech. 1988, 21: 435-438. 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90149-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Duff B, Amtmann G, Kohler G: Cycling and running performance, not anthropometric factors, are associated with race performance in a triple iron triathlon. Res Sports Med. 2007, 15: 257-269. 10.1080/15438620701693264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Kohler G: Running performance, not anthropometric factors, is associated with race success in a Triple Iron Triathlon. Br J Sports Med. 2007, 43: 437-441.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman MD: Anthropometric characteristics of ultramarathoners. Int J Sports Med. 2008, 29: 808-811. 10.1055/s-2008-1038434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Wirth A, Baumann B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T, Oliver S: Differential correlations between anthropometry, training volume, and performance in male and female Ironman triathletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010, 24: 2785-2793. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c643b6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bam J, Noakes TD, Juritz J, Dennis SC: Could women outrun men in ultramarathon races?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997, 29: 244-247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rüst CA, Rosemann T: A comparison of anthropometric and training characteristics of Ironman triathletes and Triple Iron ultra-triathletes. J Sports Sci. 2011, 29: 1373-1380. 10.1080/02640414.2011.587442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knoth C, Knechtle B, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R: Participation and performance trends in multistage ultramarathons—the ‘Marathon des Sables’ 2003–2012. Extreme Physiology & Medicine. 2012, 1: 13-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T, Senn O: Personal best time, not anthropometry or training volume, is associated with total race time in a triple iron triathlon. J Strength Cond Res. 2011, 25: 1142-1150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laursen PB, Rhodes EC: Factors affecting performance in an ultraendurance triathlon. Sports Med. 2001, 31: 195-209. 10.2165/00007256-200131030-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbst L, Knechtle B, Lopez CL, Andonie JL, Fraire OS, Kohler G, Rüst CA, Rosemann T: Pacing strategy and change in body composition during a Deca Iron Triathlon. Chin J Physiol. 2011, 54: 255-263. 10.4077/CJP.2011.AMM115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scrimgeour AG, Noakes TD, Adams B, Myburgh K: The influence of weekly training distance on fractional utilization of maximum aerobic capacity in marathon and ultramarathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986, 55: 202-209. 10.1007/BF00715006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bescós R, Rodríguez FA, Iglesias X, Knechtle B, Benítez A, Marina M, Padullés JM, Torrado P, Vazquez J, Rosemann T: Nutritional behavior of cyclists during a 24-hour team relay race: a field study report. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2012, 9: 3-10.1186/1550-2783-9-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T: Higher prevalence of exercise-associated hyponatremia in triple iron ultra-triathletes than reported for ironman triathletes. Chin J Physiol. 2012, 55: 147-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sigg K, Knechtle B, Rüst CA, Knechtle P, Rosemann T, Lepers R: Central European athletes dominate Double Iron ultra-triathlon - analysis of participation and performance from 1985 to 2011. Open Access J Sports Med. 2012, 3: 159-168.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeffery S, Knechtle B, Rüst CA, Knechtle P, Lepers R, Rosemann T: European dominance in Triple Iron ultra-triathlons from 1988 to 2011. J Sci Cycl. 2012, 1: 30-38.Google Scholar
- O’Connor LM, Vozenilek JA: Is it the athlete or the equipment? An analysis of the top swim performances from 1990 to 2010. J Strength Cond Res. 2011, 25: 3239-3241. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392c5f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheuvront SN, Haymes EM: Thermoregulation and marathon running: biological and environmental influences. Sports Med. 2001, 31: 743-762. 10.2165/00007256-200131100-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Montain SJ, Ely MR, Cheuvront SN: Marathon performance in thermally stressing conditions. Sports Med. 2007, 37: 320-323. 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parise CA, Hoffman MD: Influence of temperature and performance level on pacing a 161 km trail ultramarathon. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011, 6: 243-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trapasso LM, Cooper JD: Record performances at the Boston Marathon: biometeorological factors. Int J Biometeorol. 1989, 33: 233-237. 10.1007/BF01051083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Pfeifer S, Rosemann T, Lepers R, Senn O: Gender difference and age-related changes in performance at the long distance duathlon World Championships. J Strength Cond Res. 2013, 27 (2): 293-301. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825420d0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.