Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

Muscle activity during simulated work in the cold

  • Julie Renberg1Email author,
  • Per Øyvind Stranna Tvetene2,
  • Øystein Nordrum Wiggen1,
  • Karin Roeleveld2,
  • Mireille Van Beekvelt2 and
  • Hilde Færevik1
Extreme Physiology & Medicine20154(Suppl 1):A113

https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-7648-4-S1-A113

Published: 14 September 2015

Keywords

Maximal Voluntary ContractionSkin TemperatureElbow FlexorProtective ClothingShoulder Abductor

Introduction

The abundance of natural resources in the Barents region is encouraging growth and development in the far North, exposing more workers to outside work in the cold (average temperature and wind velocity at Rognsundet in Finnmark last winter were -2.6 °C and 9.8 m.s-1, with extreme values of -15.3 °C and 27.5 m.s-1). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of realistic cold exposure on muscle activity, while wearing the cold-weather protective clothing used in the mining industry.

Methods

15 male volunteers performed simulated work at two ambient temperatures (Ta): -15 °C and 5 °C. The experimental protocol consisted of five test periods and four work periods with a total exposure time of two hours. The five 10-minute test periods started with a dynamic wrist flexion (DWF) exercise, followed by maximal voluntary contraction of the wrist flexor, elbow flexor and shoulder abductor. The four work periods consisted of manual work above head level (5 min), manual work at hip height (5 min) and a lifting exercise (5 min). EMG was used to measure muscle activity, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measured local muscle metabolism. Heart rate (HR), skin and rectal temperatures (Tre) were measured continuously. The protective clothing worn was identical under both environmental conditions.

Results

During the two hours of exposure at -15 °C compared to 5 °C, mean skin temperature and finger skin temperature fell by 2.7 °C and 10-15 °C, respectively. Forearm skin temperature was stable at around 32.5 °C and 30.9 °C in 5 °C and -15 °C, respectively. No differences in either Tre or HR between the Ta were observed. There was a significant interaction effect between Ta and time at the experiment in EMG activity (Figure 1). Deoxygenation during DWF was significantly more pronounced at 5 °C than -15 °C, but no interaction effect was found between Ta and time.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Mean amplitude (% of max activation) in right flexor digitorum superficialis: manual work hip height for work period 1, 2, 3, and 4. # significant interaction effect between Ta and time. Data is presented as mean (SD) (N = 13).

Discussion

Even though there was not a large difference in skin temperature at -15 °and 5 °C, it may have been sufficient to affect muscle function. At 5 °C, there was a gradual reduction in EMG activity, compared to a stable development at -15 °C. This difference could be related to temperature-dependent co-activation of muscle pairs [1]. More pronounced cooling would probably have had a more detrimental effect on muscle performance.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated that realistic cold exposure reduces skin temperatures, particularly in the extremities, while wearing protective clothing used in the mining industry. Exposure to -15 °C led to increased local muscle activation during manual work at hip height. While the current protective clothing provides sufficient thermal protection with regard to maintaining core temperature, the extremities are liable to become cold. It is therefore, important to focus on cold protection in the extremities in order to maintain miners' comfort and performance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Research, SINTEF Technology and Society, Trondheim, Norway
(2)
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

References

  1. Oksa J, et al: Cooling-induced changes in muscular performance and EMG activity of agonist and antagonist muscles. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine. 1995, 66 (1): 26-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Renberg et al.; 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement