Volume 4 Supplement 1

15th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics (ICEE XV)

Open Access

Biophysical characteristics and thermophysiological responses at the inflection point in deep body temperature for individuals with high or low aerobic fitness

  • Ella F Walker1Email author,
  • Jo Corbett1,
  • James R House1 and
  • Michael J Tipton1
Extreme Physiology & Medicine20154(Suppl 1):A51

DOI: 10.1186/2046-7648-4-S1-A51

Published: 14 September 2015

Introduction

Endurance training increases aerobic fitness, improves thermoregulatory function [1] and exercise tolerance in the heat [2]. However, studies comparing individuals of high and low aerobic fitness during exercise in the heat are often confounded by differences in body weight and body composition [3]. It is also disputed if using the relative work rate to standardise exercise intensity is appropriate [4, 5] as individuals with higher aerobic fitness will be working at a higher absolute work rate with increased heat production. This study examined the influence of aerobic fitness on biophysical characteristics and thermophysiological responses when moving from compensable to uncompensable conditions, at matched relative and absolute work rates, under conditions of high and low humidity.

Methods

Eight high (HI) (VO2max = 58.73[6.28] mL.kg-1.min-1) and eight low aerobic fitness (LO) (46.53[6.73] mL.kg-1.min-1) males, matched for body mass, body surface area and % body fat volunteered. LO exercised at 60 W (ABS) in a hot-humid (28 °C starting temperature, 80 % rh [HH]) and hot-dry (34 °C starting temperature, 20 % rh [HD]) environment. HI completed the same trials, plus an additional trial in each condition to match the relative intensity of the LO group exercising at 60 W (REL). Tdb was incremented after 60 minutes of exercise until an inflection in rectal temperature (Treinfl). Tdb, Tre, upper back sweat rate (SRBack) and forearm skin blood flow (SkBF) were measured at the Treinfl. Data were analysed by mixed-model ANOVA, with post hoc analysis by paired (effect of humidity) or independent t-tests (effect of fitness).

Results

Tdb at Tre inflection was lower in the HH condition in both ABS (p < 0.001) and REL (p < 0.001) conditions. Additionally, during REL trials, Tdb at Treinfl was lower for HI than LO in the HH condition (p = 0.013). Tre was lower in HI than LO at the Treinfl in the HH condition during ABS trials (p = 0.010), with no effect of fitness or humidity condition in REL trials. HI had higher SRBack at the T r einfl in in both ABS trials (HH, p = 0.030; HD, p = 0.005) and REL trials (HH, p = 0.001; HD condition, p < 0.001). SkBF at the Treinfl not differ between any of the trials (p > 0.05).

Discussion

There was no effect of fitness on Tdb at Treinfl at ABS, but HI had a lower Tdb at Treinfl at REL in the HH condition reflecting the higher metabolic heat production and lower capacity for evaporative heat loss. The difference in Tre at the inflection point between HI and LO, in the HH environment, may be due to the need to maintain a gradient for heat exchange from core to shell under conditions where an increased SR is not sufficient to maintain heat loss. Nonetheless, HI individuals have been shown to tolerate higher Tc temperatures than LO counterparts when exercising in the heat [2] and the practical significance of the lower Tre at the inflection point is unclear.

Conclusion

Despite improved thermoregulatory function, when body weight and body composition are controlled, aerobic fitness does not offer any benefit in terms of the biophysical conditions eliciting the transition to uncompensable heat stress when exercising a given ABS. Moreover, the Treinfl may occur at a lower Tdb in HI individuals when working at matched REL under conditions that limit evaporative heat loss. Finally, HI individuals may show a Treinfl at a lower Tre during exercise at a given ABS in HH conditions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Extreme Environments Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth

References

  1. Aoyagi Y, McLellan TM, Shephard RJ: Interactions of Physical Training and Heat Acclimation. Sport Med. 1997, 23 (3): 173-210. 10.2165/00007256-199723030-00004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. McLellan TM: The importance of aerobic fitness in determining tolerance to uncompensable heat stress. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001, 128 (4): 691-700. 10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00275-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jay O, Bain AR, Deren TM, Sacheli M, Cramer MN: Large differences in peak oxygen uptake do not independently alter changes in core temperature and sweating during exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011, 301 (3): 832-841. 10.1152/ajpregu.00257.2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gass GC, McLellan TM, Gass EM: Effects of prolonged exercise at a similar percentage of maximal oxygen consumption in trained and untrained subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991, 63 (6): 430-435. 10.1007/BF00868074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Saltin B, Hermansen LJ: Esophageal, rectal, and muscle temperature during exercise. Appl Physiol. 1966, 21 (6): 1757-1762.Google Scholar
  6. Ichinose-Kuwahara T, Inoue Y, Iseki Y, Hara S, Ogura Y, Kondo N: . Exp Physiol. 2010, 95 (10): 1026-1032. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053710.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Walker et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement