Volume 4 Supplement 1

15th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics (ICEE XV)

Open Access

Fire Service Instructor's undergarment choice can minimise physiological and perceptual strain

Extreme Physiology & Medicine20154(Suppl 1):A67

DOI: 10.1186/2046-7648-4-S1-A67

Published: 14 September 2015

Introduction

The South East Regional Fire Service requested an investigation into the effect of different undergarments worn by fire service instructors, to help improve thermoregulation and reduce the strain experienced. Literature suggests that wearing shorts and t-shirt may reduce heat strain [1], whilst no research has yet established the effect of wearing compression undergarments in fire environments. The study aimed to identify which type of undergarment [boiler suit (BOILER), whole body compression garments (COMPRESSION) or shorts and t-shirt (SHORTS)] produced the least physiological and perceptual strain.

Methods

Eight males (age 20 ± 2 years; weight 75.7 ± 7.1 kg; height 177 ± 7 cm) were monitored during three 45 mins sessions in a heat chamber (49.5 ± 1.4 °C and 16.9 ± 4.3 % rh) whilst performing intermittent exercise [5 mins walking (4 km.h¯¹, 1 % gradient) and 5 mins rest]. Participants wore fire service kit and a rucksack to replicate a breathing apparatus, weighing 17 kg in total. Physiological and perceptual measures were recorded every 5 min. Venous blood samples were collected before and after heat exposure for analysis of interleukin (IL)-6.

Results

Two way repeated measures ANOVA's were conducted, and revealed significant interactions for change in heart rate, change in rectal temperature (ΔTre), volume of oxygen uptake (VO2), physiological strain index (PSI) and IL-6, p < 0.05. IL-6 was significantly decreased for COMPRESSION (6.45 ± 0.43 pg.mL¯¹) and SHORTS (6.59 ± 0.30 pg.mL¯¹) compared to BOILER (6.96 ± 0.28 pg.mL¯¹), p < 0.05. Significant differences were also present between garment types at 45min for PSI and ΔTre, with trends suggesting COMPRESSION caused the lowest levels of strain (4.06 ± 0.85 °C, and 0.70 ± 0.31 °C, respectively) compared to SHORTS (4.50 ± 1.07 °C and 0.76 ± 0.37 °C, respectively) and BOILER (5.07 ± 1.02 °C and 1.00 ± 0.56 °C, respectively), p < 0.05. Thermal sensation (TSS) trends suggest that COMPRESSION (7.13 ± 0.52) generated less perceptual stress in comparison to SHORTS (7.43 ± 0.45) and BOILER (7.75 ± 0.27), p > 0.05.

Discussion

Previous studies have noted no thermoregulatory improvement whilst wearing COMPRESSION in sporting situations[2, 3]. However, this study suggests that in hot environments, with protective clothing, wearing COMPRESSION may be beneficial, possibly due to the thin material, tight fit, and wicking capabilities of the fabric.

Conclusion

In comparison to standard issue boiler suits or shorts and t-shirt, wearing compression garments underneath protective clothing, during fire-fighting operations, significantly improves thermoregulation, reducing physiological strain and inflammation. Undergarment selection has a less pronounced effect on perceptions of stress; however differences may be meaningful to fire service instructors.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Environmental Extremes Laboratory, Centre for Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine, University of Brighton

References

  1. McLellan TM, Selkirk GA: Heat stress while wearing long pants or shorts under firefighting protective clothing. Ergonomics. 2004, 47 (1): 75-90. 10.1080/00140130310001611125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Roberts BC, Waller TM, Caine MP: Thermoregulatory Response to Base-layer Garments During Treadmill Exercise. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering. 2007, 1 (1): 29-38.Google Scholar
  3. Goh SS, Laursen PB, Dascombe B, Nosaka K: Effect of lower body compression garments on submaximal and maximal running performance in cold (10°C) and hot (32°C) environments. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011, 111 (5): 819-26. 10.1007/s00421-010-1705-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Watkins and Richardson. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement