- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
The effect of hyperthermia with localised head and neck cooling on neuromuscular function
Extreme Physiology & Medicine volume 4, Article number: A3 (2015)
Hyperthermia reduces volitional force production, voluntary muscle activation and agonist-electromyography (EMG) during a sustained maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) , . This reduction in neuromuscular function may explain a reduced exercise capacity in the heat. Cooling of the neck has been shown to improve running capacity in the heat ; however the mechanism is unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate whether localised cooling of the head and neck during hyperthermia would affect neuromuscular function following 60 min of cycling in the heat.
Fourteen male participants exercised on a cycle ergometer for 60 min at 50% VO2max in three experimental conditions; hot (35 °C, 50% rh; HOT), hot with head and neck cooling (35 °C, 50% rh; HOTcooling) and control (18 °C, 50% rh; CON). Immediately after the cycling bout, participants performed a 120-s sustained isometric MVC of the knee extensors of their dominant limb. Neuromuscular activation was assessed during the MVC at 5, 30, 90 and 120-s by superimposing supra-maximal triplet (3 impulses at 100 Hz) contractions by electrical stimulation of the femoral nerve, and calculating the central activation ratio (CAR). EMG amplitude (normalised to maximal M-wave) of the 3 superficial quadriceps heads was recorded throughout the MVC. Rectal temperature (Tre) was measured throughout each condition.
Tre was raised in both the HOT (39.27 (0.52) °C) and HOTcooling (39.19 (±0.56) °C) trials vs CON (38.07 (0.28) °C) immediately post cycling (P <0.001) and remained elevated during the 120-s MVC. Force declined throughout the MVC in all conditions (Figure 1). The decline in force was on average 18 and 13.6% greater in HOT and HOTcooling respectively compared to CON (Figure 1; P <0.001 for both). This was similar for voluntary activation, with significant reductions in HOT vs CON trials across all time points (P <0.001). Normalised agonist EMG showed significant differences between HOT vs CON throughout the first 60-s of contraction; thereafter a reduced neural drive in all conditions was similar.
Cooling had no physiological effect on Tre during hyperthermia trials. HOT appeared to show the greatest decline in voluntary force and was associated with a greater decline in CAR and normalised EMG in comparison to CON. The higher force output for HOTcooling may be explained by improved neural drive of the central nervous system to voluntarily activated muscles.
Localised head and neck cooling improves neuromuscular function of the knee extensors during a sustained MVC under hyperthermic conditions.
Nybo L, Nielsen B: Hyperthermia and central fatigue during prolonged exercise in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001, 91: 1055-1060.
Racinais S: Hot ambient conditions shift the force/EMG relationship. Springerplus. 2013, 2: 317-10.1186/2193-1801-2-317.
Tyler C, Sunderland C: Cooling the neck region during exercise in the heat. Journal of Athletic Training. 2011, 46 (1): 61-68. 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.61.